Amir Abdolahi Khalaj; Aabas Izadpanah
Abstract
This study examines the two concepts of interactionism and coherence in the context of concepts in the context of epistemological structures in the field of philosophy of religious knowledge with the conceptualization approach by adding a combined method And tries to offer a proposal to justify the propositions ...
Read More
This study examines the two concepts of interactionism and coherence in the context of concepts in the context of epistemological structures in the field of philosophy of religious knowledge with the conceptualization approach by adding a combined method And tries to offer a proposal to justify the propositions and the type of their relationship in the field of religious knowledge by considering the limitations of religious knowledge and exploring the valley of interactionism and the epistemological structure of coherence.After rereading the two concepts of interactionism and coherence in the philosophy of religious knowledge, it is necessary to express the corresponding concepts according to the structural considerations of the new context.Considering the nature of interactive and coherent structures and also considering the nature of religious knowledge and its requirements, the model of the desired structure can be considered as a rational, coherent, moderately interactive religious knowledge with preservation and scope of application of each.The structure of moderate rational religious knowledge, in order to strengthen justifiability and expand the foundations of the text outside of it, as well as in order to methodically monitor the coherence of the structure, constantly uses cohesive loops and interactive mechanisms. Timely response to theoretical and practical challenges and questions, uses them temporarily to rebuild the structure
Ebrahim Noei; Aabas Izadpanah; shareat Aghajari
Abstract
Hadith scholars and the consequences of dealing with theology(Study of epistemological and methodological consequences)Theology is a religious science that has not had a uniform history. Some believe it is necessary to address it. Some also oppose addressing it. Scholars of hadith have given several ...
Read More
Hadith scholars and the consequences of dealing with theology(Study of epistemological and methodological consequences)Theology is a religious science that has not had a uniform history. Some believe it is necessary to address it. Some also oppose addressing it. Scholars of hadith have given several reasons for this opposition. They also enumerated the wrong consequences for addressing this knowledge. Those consequences for any other knowledge should be avoided. The question of the present article is that which epistemological and methodological consequences have the scholars of hadith considered for theology? Does theology really have such consequences? It seems that this effort of the scholars of hadith only makes the scholars of theology aware of some dangers that they may face when dealing with this science. And of course, these dangers are not specific to theology, and anyone who does not follow the correct conditions for research in a science may be caught in such errors. Theologians have also paid attention to these consequences and have tried to avoid getting caught up in them. Even if one of the theologians has made a mistake, it cannot be said that theology should be abandoned.
